A Match Made in Hell: The Ruthless Jews and The Ignorant Muslims

If one person thinks that something is wrong with you then that person may be wrong.  However if everybody agrees with the person and insists that something is very wrong with you then everybody cannot be wrong.  It goes the same with the Jews:  If one country kicked them out, then the nation of that country might be bad or selfish but if all of the countries that the Jews ever lived had to kick them out, then something must be very wrong with the Jews themselves.  

Over a period of 1700 years, Jews have faced over 80 expulsions from different countries.  Just in Europe and Russia alone, the Jews have been banished 47 times in the last 1,000 years.   To name some of the places: 

1012 Mainz, 1182 France, 1276 Upper Bavaria, 1290 England, 1306 France, 1322 France, 1349 Saxony,  1360 Hungary,  1370 Belgium, ,1380 Slovakia, 1394 France, 1420 Austria, 1420 Lyons, 1424 Cologne, 1438 Mainz, 1438 Augsburg, 1442 Upper Bavaria, 1444 Netherlands, 1446 Brandenburg, 1462 Mainz, 1495 Lithuania, 1496 Portugal, 1496  Naples, 1498 Navarre, 1498 Nuremberg, 1510 Brandenburg, 1510 Prussia, 1515 Genoa, 1533 Naples, 1540 Italy, 1541 Naples, 1541 Prague, 1550 Genoa, 1551 Bavaria, 1557 Prague, 1569 Papal States, 1582 Hungary, 1649 Hamburg, 1669 Vienna, 1744 Slovakia,…etc…

As I said, logic says that there must be something very wrong with the Jews to be banished and live in exile all their lives.  So, what is wrong with the Jews?  Or is there really nothing wrong with them but a victim of horrible fate?

Whatever it is, whatever happens to them is definitely not a co-incident.   Your housemate found out that you have been flirting with his girl and thrown you out of the house is co-incident, but you being thrown out of your mum’s house and your neighbors celebrate your ‘exile’, is definitely not.    

The Jews are destined to live in exile.  Note that the key word here is ‘destined’. 

The most amazing thing is that their destiny has been written in black and white, long before they knew it would come true, which is almost like a fairy-tale.  Here’s what the Bible says about them:

Jesus said to the Jews: "Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.  (From the KJV Bible, Matthew 21:43)

O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!  (From the KJV Bible, Matthew 23:37)"

"You have heard these things; look at them all. Will you not admit them? "From now on I will tell you of new things, of hidden things unknown to you. They are created now, and not long ago; you have not heard of them before today. So you cannot say, 'Yes, I knew of them.'   You have neither heard nor understood; from of old your ear has not been open. Well do I know how treacherous you are; you were called a rebel from birth.   For my own name's sake I delay my wrath; for the sake of my praise I hold it back from you, so as not to cut you off.  (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 48:6-9)

"But now, all you who light fires and provide yourselves with flaming torches, go, walk in the light of your fires and of the torches you have set ablaze. This is what you shall receive from my hand: You will lie down in torment.  (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 50:11

I understand that the Quran says the same thing too, more or less - about the Jews.   It is said that the Jews are stubborn, arrogant and very rude and therefore they are the lowest of mankind. They are ruthless and cruel but also coward and will create so much damage to mankind in terms of humanity, morality and the earth itself:

"And we decreed for the Children of Israel in the Scripture, that indeed you would do mischief on the earth twice and you will become tyrants and extremely arrogant! So, when the promise came for the first of the two, We sent against you slaves of Ours given to terrible warfare. They entered the very innermost parts of your homes. And it was a promise (completely) fulfilled. Then We gave you once again, a return of victory over them. And We helped you with wealth and children and made you more numerous in manpower. (And We said): 'If you do well, you do good for your ownselves, and if you do evil (you do it) against yourselves'. Then, when the second promise came to pass, (We permitted your enemies) to make your faces sorrowful and to enter the mosque (of Jerusalem) as they had entered it before, and to destroy with utter destruction all that fell in their hands. [And We Said in the Taurat (Torah)]: 'It may be that your Lord may show mercy unto you, but if you return (to sins), We shall return (to Our Punishment). And We have made Hell a prison for the disbelievers" [Qur'an 17:4-8].

'And those of the people of the Scripture backed them (the disbelievers) - Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land, which you had not trodden (before)' [Qur'an 33:26-27]". [Adwa' ul-Bayaan 3/408]

"They fight not against you even together, except in fortified townships, or from behind walls. Their enmity among themselves is very great" [59:14],

"and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped" [3:111].

"And verily, you will find them (the Jews) the greediest of mankind for life.." [2:96].

Now, all these verses are written some thousands of years ago and here we are witnessing them, almost word by word.  If you are looking for God, then you don’t have to look further.  The Jews are evident that God exists. 

Of course, not all Jews are bad, but that doesn’t mean that the words of God are not true.  God has specifically caution us and remind us of the existence of such human who call themselves Jews or the Israelis or the children of Israel who will cause the world so much pain and damage. 

Ironically, it is the Jews too, who helped make the world a better place with their inventions and discoveries.  They are the ones who explore the earth and learn from God’s great universe.  They are the ones who knew better about the Power That Be, but choose to deny. 

The Muslims believe in these verses and take the words of the Quran seriously.  The Christians, however, are divided.  Some Christians are scared of being accused as anti-semitics or racists should they choose to believe in the words of the Bibles.  Some Christians even doubt the Bible and interpret it differently in order to suit what they believe as humane and just, that is to not judge the Jews. 

However, things are started to change around the world.  More and more Christians are able to see the truth and the world now agrees that it is the Zionist that is the problem, not the Jews as a race or Judaism as a religion.  It is the Zionists that give all the Jews a bad name. 

The Muslims, though taking the verses of the Quran seriously, never make any preparation to face the worst of the Zionist Jews.  Instead, the Muslims weep for their fate for decades, and wait patiently for the day where they will rise.  Nothing is done in between the waiting, except, of course, pray. 

The Muslims actually believe that they can one day rise, by just praying. 

Many Muslims believe that their horrible fate is a punishment for not being good enough Muslims and blame every other Muslims as sinners.  They blame the destruction on other Muslims for drinking alcohol, for wearing jeans or necktie that resembles the Zionists.

And most of all, they believe that it is the Muslim women not covering the heads is what caused the destruction of the Muslim world. 

Well, if this is true then tell me what happened to Afghanistan?  The women there are all covered up from head to toe and not allowed to go out and about.  The men have been claiming themselves as the ‘holliest of them all’.  Yet, the country was bombed back to stone-ages.

So, it looks to me that covering up all women and not drinking alcohol are not enough to stop the destruction of the Muslim’s world.   

The worst part is that the Muslims don’t even dare to admit that their theory is wrong!  They keep insisting that their theory of destruction is right even as they watch their brothers and sisters being killed by the Zionist and its proxies - for decades. 

The Muslims continue to preach on covering up the women and call all Muslims to pray harder - and that is all there is – for decades. 

Today, I heard that some schools in Malaysia have increased the hours for Islamic subjects and cut the hours for Math and Science in the Muslims’ effort to ‘rise’ again.

What they didn’t know is that while the prayers are meant to keep them on the right path and give them strength in spirit, only math and science can help them defend themselves, physically.  By cutting the hours for math and science, the Muslims are leaping further and further backwards, thus invite greater destruction to themselves.    

If only the Muslims take some time to think and not so busy pointing fingers at others, they will realized that the Prophet Muhammad too, didn’t win the wars just by simply praying.  Instead, he strategized and strived to be above the enemies.  The lesson here is that, even he, couldn’t win the war by just praying. 

Prophet Muhammad won the war because Allah helped him through brilliant strategies and great leadership combined with strong loyal men armed with adequate weaponry. 

This is because, Islam is a logical religion and I found this out from the Quran.  Allah works through math and science as is seen in the universe.   As such, it is said that the greatest and miraculous gift of all, is the ‘brain’ itself.  Therefore, you cannot pray and wait for miracle but you must create miracle!

The Zionists invented weapons to destroy you but they also invented tools and equipments that you use to make your life easier – the planes, the medicines, the cars, the facebooks…  How can you blame them totally when you have to thank them too?  Why couldn’t you invent these things yourself after all these lives? 

What have you been using your brains for if not for the good of mankind?  Why do you not follow the Quran, when you recite it everyday?  Why do you refuse to acknowledge the miracle of your brain, the greatest gift all?

And until the Muslims are able to understand this, and accept this and do something about this, ‘the rise of the Muslims’ as written in the Quran, may not come any time soon. 

I rest my case.  

Are the Jews “Victims” of Hate – or are THEY the HATERS?

I just thought that this is something worth sharing. I will write about this when I can.  For the time being, enjoy the reading: 

____________________________________________________

An Open Letter to Jewish journalist, Dr. Henry Makow

(E-mailed to Dr. Makow on 2/21/08)

Dear Dr. Makow:

I have enjoyed your many articles on different subjects, including the New World Order, the Illuminati, and the Feminist Movement.  I happen to be a female physician, in a particularly "macho" specialty – Orthopedic Surgery - in which there are very few women, but I agree with you about the destruction of masculinity in America.  I don’t know if you have specifically laid the blame for this movement, but it clearly should be laid at the feet of the Jews.  The super feminists who have led the Feminist movement from the very beginning have been Jews:  Betty Friedan, Bella Abzug, Gloria Steinem, etc.  The Feminist movement is Jewish to its core.  It is part of the plan for the destruction of the family and the destruction of Christianity.

I also agree with you that the BIG Jews are perfectly happy to destroy the rank and file Jews.

But here is where I disagree with you.  You say that the rank and file
Jews are really not responsible for the plan of the elitist Jews to control the world and destroy the Gentiles.  I agree that the rank and file Jews do not KNOW the extent of the plan.  But Jews in general are raised with a Talmudic culture, whether they have heard of the Talmud or not.  They are raised with the idea that they are better than Gentiles, that they have a right to control them, take whatever belongs to them, and look down on them.

Believe me, I have plenty of experience and knowledge of this attitude.
My mother was born and raised in Brooklyn.  When my mother was a little schoolgirl in Brooklyn, on Jewish holidays there were only two students in her class, - herself and one other (“Gentile”) girl.  Everyone else was Jewish.  My mother knew very well that all the (Jewish) shopkeepers were trying to cheat Gentiles, they lied constantly to Gentiles, and looked down on Gentiles.

When I was a resident in my medical training, at one point I rotated through a Jewish hospital.  I had never seen such rude, undignified, uncouth and downright degenerate behavior by human beings.  The Jewish doctors yelled at each other in the Operating Room, they called each other names, they threw surgical instruments at each other in the hallway in the Operating Room area - sometimes from as far away as 20 feet, they had huge, loud verbal brawls with each other in the hallways of the area where patients' rooms were, with the patients all standing (those who could) in the doorway watching this fiasco, they lied about the surgical procedures they had performed in the O.R. when they turned out badly (I would have scrubbed with them on the procedure and I KNEW what they had done, but when those cases were presented in the doctors' conference, they flat-out LIED) and all sorts of other crude, uncouth and immoral behavior about which I could go on and on and on.
When I asked them WHY they behaved in such a barbaric, childish, primitive, way, they looked at me with surprise and said, “Oh, that’s fun!”

The reason that Jews have been kicked out of nearly every country in the world for hundreds and hundreds of years is NOT because they are hated because of their “race” – it is because of their barbarian, uncouth, immoral and disgusting behavior!
For two years after I left my rotation at that Jewish hospital, I couldn't even go back in its doors for the city-wide Orthopedic conferences we would occasionally have there because I actually became nauseated when I entered that hospital, even though I got in trouble with my superiors for not attending the conference.  For several years after I left that hospital, when Ieven drove down the main thoroughfare of the city that passed within a few blocks of that hospital, I would get sick to my stomach.

I was raised as a Christian, to be kind and civil and courteous to people.  But it was clear that virtually ALL the Jews at that hospital (with the exception of maybe one or two) were behaving like barbarians. THIS is why the Jews have been thrown out of scores of countries in the world throughout history.  Even the average rank and file Jew has NO concern for anyone but himself.

I agree that not all Jews are like that, but the few who aren't are such extreme examples they are almost reportable in a medical or political journal.  My best friend in college was Jewish.  She was generous, kind, and the antithesis of the average Jew.  She also HATED the way the Jews behaved - even the behavior of her own mother, who her Jewish father divorced to marry a Gentile.  My friend loved her mother, but she told her on many occasions , "Mom, I love you but I am NEVER going to be like you."  Her mother was a typical, complaining, selfish, neurotic, Jewish mother who was always putting a guilt trip on her children.
And what about the Kol Nidre oath!  That is NOT just repeated by the elitist Jews.  The rank and file Jew goes to temple once a year to repeat that oath to absolve themselves of all the cheating, lying and stealing they plan to do in the coming year.

My point is, if it is not already clear, that the rank and file Jews are VERY responsible for what is going on at the top.  They TOO believe they have the right to rule over Gentiles.  They TOO believe in the lies of the supposed "extermination" camps of the Holocaust, and that THEY are the ones who have been victimized above ALL others, and that the suffering of anyone else doesn't matter at all - including the slaughter of 100 million Gentiles in Russia and the Ukraine by the Jews (the Jewish Bolsheviks like Lenin, Stalin, Marx and Trotsky), the present "genociding" of the Palestinians by the Jews, and many, many other instances of this type of ugly Jewish behavior against Gentiles throughout history.
I am not Jewish, but I have blood relatives who are Jewish, and I love them as much as all my other non-Jewish relatives.  Fortunately, they don't behave like the majority of Jews behave.

Jewishness is NOT a race, it is a culture - the culture of the Talmud, which, as you well know, is about the filthiest, most hateful book on the face of the earth – a book that states, “Even the best of the Gentiles should ALL be killed.”  If that is not HATE-speech – then what is?  

I do not hate or dislike Jews.  But I certainly hate the way that most of them behave.  God loves every person the same, and so must we, but the Jews will have to do a LOT of reaping of their atrocious, hateful behavior in order to eventually "reap what they have sown" as God’s Word clearly states will happen.

Their immoral, hateful behavior will ultimately destroy them as a people.  They, as a people, will self-destruct because “Hate” eventually destroys the one who hates!

Sincerely,
Lorraine Day, M.D.

 www.goodnewsaboutgod.com/studies/political/jews/hate_victims.htm

The Singapore-Israel Love Affair

I'm sharing with you here an article from Huffington Post back in 2012 for you to ponder, as I think it is very relevant to my previous few posts on this blog.

 

(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-sleeper/blame-the-latest-israelar_b_2147509.html)

Blame the Latest Israel-Arab War on... Singapore?

Posted: 11/17/2012 10:00 am

Israel's last big military venture into Gaza began soon after Barack Obama's 2008 election and before his 2009 inauguration. It's more than ironic that this is happening again between Obama's re-election and his coming re-installation.

But here I won't get into conspiracy theories or into "who started it" in 1936, 1948, 1967, 1973, 2006, 2009, or now. Been there, done that, and, tragically, not enough has changed since the last time.

What I do have now that I didn't in 2009 is a small part of the story of Israel's militarization that sheds light on Israel's inclinations and strategic judgments. Before telling it, let me emphasize that ever since I assessed the first Gaza war, online and on NPR, I've considered Hamas' end game and how it does business inexcusable. But equally so -- and arguably more stupid, because unsustainable -- has been Israel's long "holding pen" strategy against Gaza and, arguably, the West Bank.

Now that each side has again provoked the other's darkest impulses, I can offer only a bit of background to the tactically and technologically clever but strategically and politically bone-headed conduct of Israeli politicians. It concerns a country whose similarities to Israel are a lot more striking than its obvious differences.

In 1965, when Singapore declared its independence, its first prime-minister (and, for many years, its virtual dictator) Lee Kuan Yew asked Israel to design, set up, and supervise its military machine. Israel did precisely that. How successfully? Just this month, the Bonn International Center for Conversion published a world-wide survey ranking Israel the world's most militarized nation -- and Singapore the second-most.

You can read about the Bonn Center's ranking here. To find out how Israel and Singapore actually got together on this, you'd have to have been reading accounts like this one on"Israel's Deep Dark Secret Love Affair" with Singapore in Haaretz, one of several Israeli newspapers that, even when partisan, are far more open about Israel itself than major U.S. news organizations are.

I knew nothing about this love affair in 2009, when, while watching office parks and eight-lane expressways gliding by my window on a Tel Aviv-to-Haifa train, I mentioned to my wife that Israel has become the Singapore of the Middle East. I had no idea then that Singapore had long been the Israel of Southeast Asia not only economically and geo-politically -- as a glance at a couple of maps and statistical tables will suggest -- but militarily, with all the intimacy of that "Deep, Dark, Secret Love Affair" that's now nearly 50 years old.

The similarities of these two little engines that could (and did) become models of state capitalism with high per capita incomes and growth rates haven't often been noted. Both have been governed and stamped by the British. Both have populations of 5 or 6 million, including 2 or 3 million second-class citizens and non-citizens, some of them migrants, some of them openly despised.

Both Israel and Singapore are non-Muslim, and both face much larger, less-than-friendly Muslim neighbors -- in Singapore's case, Indonesia and Malaysia, the latter of which expelled Singapore in 1965 (or lost it, depending on who's telling), amid high racial tensions.

Yet another striking analogy involves the fact that the politically dominant majority of Singapore's population consists not of indigenous natives but of "overseas" Han Chinese," whose literary and commercial strengths long ago earned them the sobriquet "the Jews of Southeast Asia" and the envy and resentment due a wealthy, elitist, and supple minority.

Like Jews who live outside Israel, the Han Chinese are minorities in most countries outside China, but here a real difference dogs the similarity. The similarity is that in Singapore, the Chinese are 75% of the population, and Malays are 15%, Indians 8%' in Israel, Jews are 76%, with the rest mostly Palestinian Arabs, most of them Muslim some of them Christian. In Singapore the Chinese have a status, power, and reputation that will sound familiar to Palestinians and others who regard Israel's Jews as arrogant interlopers.

The difference is that Israel's Jews, unlike Singapore's Chinese, have never been the rooted, dominant majority in any other country besides ancient Israel itself, where Hebrew was spoken 700 years before Arabic. And there are other differences of consequence: Singapore is an island, a micro-state smaller in area and population than New York City's five boroughs. Israel is 30 times larger, geographically, and in some ways more dangerous and endangered.

That said, Singapore's and Israel's situations at international crossroads of trade and power at opposite ends of the Asian continent incline them both to serve as investment and cultural entrepots and as political mediators. Without oil, water, or minerals to speak of, both live mainly by their wits, which is to say by trade. But both are compelled to militarize, and both have formidable armed forces, with defense budgets that consume 5 or 6% of GDP, a proportion much higher than that of all but a few other nations, including even China.

The International Political Review calls Singapore's armed forces "the most technologically advanced military in Southeast Asia" and notes that while everyone in the region fears China and no one could prevail against a Chinese onslaught, China fears that any such onslaught would bring a very painful Singapore Sting.

The punchline to all this, not very funny but very, very true, is that no sooner had Singapore gained its independence in August 1965 than its British-educated founder and first prime minister, Lee Kuan Yew (whose eldest son is now prime minister), invited Israel to organize his armed forces, because he saw all the parallels between the two young nations that I've just noted.

On Christmas Eve, 1965, six Israel Defense Force officers and their families moved to Singapore, followed by waves of consulting teams that established the country's "Total Defense" combat doctrines, its recruitment and training regimens, its intelligence services, and its state-of-art arms procurement.

"We are not going to turn Singapore into an Israeli colony," chief of staff and future prime minister Yitzhak Rabin admonished these teams. He needn't have worried. Singapore's highly intelligent, eloquent, ruthlessly energetic dictator knew how to collaborate without being colonized, something one couldn't say about some of the Americans he's been collaborating with most recently. He was as deft and determined as the Han Chinese in other countries who, even as minorities, dominate major industries, banks, and even English-language media in the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand.

The Israelis militarized Singaporean society, even with Israeli military songs, to which Lee's soldiers marched in one of Singapore's first real Independence Day parades. Less symbolically, they showed Singapore how to establish military conscription in a hitherto un-militaristic populace that, according to at least one survey, ranked the profession of soldier far below that of thief, while placing artists, teachers and merchants on top.

So determined was Lee to adjust this that when Israel won the Six-Day War in 1967, vindicating his decision to work with it and boosting Singaporeans' confidence in their Jewish military mentors, Singapore's UN delegation surprised other Third World nations by abstaining on a resolution condemning Israel.

Israelis persuaded Lee to make conscription universal to tap well-educated, prosperous Han Chinese as well as the Malay, Indian, and other minorities. That produced an intelligent, dynamic army and a disciplined male student population, and non-Singaporean university students at the country's universities can receive substantial tuition subsidies but must accept what the National University of Singapore calls "a service bond under the terms of the tuition grant to work for a Singapore-registered company for three years upon completion of their degrees so as to discharge some of their obligations to the Singapore public." In some professions, the mandatory service is to government agencies, for up to six years. Such disciplined incentives produce more than a little griping, but little softness or self-indulgence.

All this has posed an exquisitely discomfiting dilemma for Yale's neoconservatives, who never hesitate to ridicule leftists who've collaborated with authoritarian "Third World" regimes. Now they find themselves looking into a mirror and falling spookily silent about Yale's collaboration with Singapore in setting up an undergraduate liberal arts college.

When Shaunziming Tan published a damning essay about Yale's and other Western universities' collaborations with such regimes, Michael Rubin of the neoconservative flagship Commentary Magazine commented, quite rightly, that

"Foreigners flock to American universities because of their freedom and opportunity. How sad it is then, as Tan describes, that so many American university presidents are willing to compromise basic values in order to make a quick buck, often padding endowments which already reach billions of dollars. That will not bring progress; it is simply intellectual prostitution."

Unlike Yale in Singapore, Israel was smart enough to keep its name out of the public eye at the time, eager though it was to advance its national interests and prestige.

So it's noteworthy -- and perhaps commendable -- that Rubin condemned Yale and other universities for accommodating to an authoritarian regime that has worked so closely with Israelis without drawing criticism from defenders of authoritarian regimes at Commentary.

At least this should teach other neoconservatives what Yitzhak Rabin and Lee Kuan Yew always understood and what I learned after my epiphany on the road to Haifa: matters like these cannot be viewed clearly through binary, left-vs.-right lenses: Leftists who supported "people's liberation struggles" by helping to harvest sugar cane in Cuba or crops in early Israeli socialist kibbutzim believed that nation-building requires disciplined struggle and sacrifice to lay the groundwork for prosperity and, with it, national pride, often at cost to individual freedom.

But even in the 1960's, when Singapore was getting underway, it was already more authoritarian in its nation-building than Israel had been, at least among its own Jewish citizens, but even to some extent among Arabs who became citizens of Israel. Perhaps that was because Jews, fleeing recent destruction and facing new/ancient enemies with Western Enlightenment traditions, some of them as socialists, bonded in relatively more democratic, egalitarian ways.

Although Singaporean society hasn't had to be on military alert as much as Israel, neither has it become the Switzerland of Southeast Asia, a region bristling with huge armies. Singapore does have enough economic and military power to take another bit of advice that the Israelis of Rabin's time gave it and should take more seriously themselves than they have under Netanyahu: Keep your vast military under the radar, if possible while strengthening and showcasing your diplomatic, cultural, and educational offerings.

Singapore is trying to become the education center of Southeast Asia by setting up a liberal arts college that bears Yale's imprimatur, while controlling the showcase as tightly as it does the military. "Increasingly we are noted for taking up the knowledge industries and doing cutting edge stuff," says Ambassador Chan.

Note, though, that, in this official view, education is an "industry," perhaps even a "cutting edge" weapon of sorts. Can any liberal democracy ever hope to flourish while pacing a gilded but iron cage?

Correction: This post originally misstated that Michael Rubin "has propagandized for war with Iran" and has since been updated.

Correction: This post originally misstated the terms of Singapore's incentive program for university students. This has since been updated.

No ‘Allah’ Mentioned in 10-Point Solution

The case of ‘Allah’s name in The Herald’ now closed. The decision made was that The Herald is not allowed to use the word ‘Allah’ in its publication. Fullstop.

I do not understand how some Christians have a hard time to understand that. Soon after the verdict was announced, the Christians are already making a ‘pledge’ to continue to use the word ‘Allah’ elsewhere, except The Herald.

It is disgusting to see how some Christians PRETEND not to understand that the case was about The Herald breaking the law under Section 9, Selangor’s Non-Islamic Religions Enactment 1988, that says that the word ‘Allah’ is only for Islam and other religions are prohibited from using it in their religious activities or publication. Therefore, the Christians cannot use the word ‘Allah’ in The Herald or elsewhere in Selangor.

The Christians argued that this prohibition has gone out of the context of Article 11 and 11(4) on freedom of religion and wish to disregard the Selangor Law.

In that case, does it say anywhere in the 1988 Enactment that prohibits Christians from practicing their religion? No!

Then which part of Article 11 and 11(4) that has gone out of context?

Are the Christians’ prayers unanswered now because they don’t pray to ‘Allah’? Was it answered before? Are the prayers of the Christians in the U.S answered because they don’t pray to ‘Allah’? You don’t know. Nobody knows.

The truth is that, the Christians are only fighting for the rights to spread the religion through manipulation of the word ‘Allah’.

Well, the last I checked, manipulation is not a part of Christianity so does the word ‘Allah’.

So, which part on freedom of religion did the Christians not enjoy?

Like a stubborn child or a retard, some Christians refuse to understand. And now, they are using the 2011 10-Point Solution as a back-up argument.

I say, fine! Let’s read what the 10-Point Solution said:

Now, I’m asking all you Christians to answer this like good Christians that you say you are: Which part of the 10 points that allows Christians to use the word ‘Allah’ and bypass the 1988 Enactment? None!

Therefore, why are you doing all these my dear brothers and sisters? Why are you challenging the Law? Why do you want to create tension? Are you seriously asking for war?

Is this what Christianity taught us? If it is, then I’m out of it.

If you may see what is happening in Sudan today - a person can be sentenced to death just for being Christian. While in Central Africa, the Muslims are being slaughtered and massacred by Christians in a ‘holy’ Christian-Muslim’ war.

Now, thanks to you, the Christians are the new extremists and potential terrorists in Asia.

But of course, you will not pick up a gun and shoot the Muslims because that would be too obvious. You would rather be the ones who leak the gas and let the Muslims light the fire themselves. That way, you wouldn’t be blamed.

Like a true evil, you will stand by the side, quietly laughing as you watch both the Christians and the Muslims burn to hell.

Is Christian a Religion, a Philosophy or a Tool?

It has been over a week since I last updated this blog. As you know, I was away on holiday, trying to figure myself out. I even went to the Vatican City to sort of renewing my faith and I must admit that I failed miserably.

The Vatican City was crowded over summer. Hundreds of people queued to get in. Inside, there were tour guides all around explaining Jesus to their groups and I took the effort to squeeze into one of the groups to listen and digest the information, or rather, stories. Well, in the end that was all that they were to me…stories.

It was hard to take things seriously with the naked bronze Hercules staring at me. For a moment, I was asking myself, what is he doing here? It was not his nakedness that bothers me, in fact, all other figurines and paintings are naked too, but rather the fact that he is kind of a ‘God’ in the place dedicated to some other kind of God, that gives me the ‘shiver’. I was imagining thunder and lightning as the Gods fight in the Vatican. I hope they forgive me for my imagination.

The Sistine Chapel was a full-house, overcrowded as the people waited for the Pope. Too bad, that the Pope didn’t make an appearance. I was disappointed as I wanted so much to hear what he has to say although I was firmly told to never ask question.

So, I left the Vatican feeling nothing but tired as hell for the suffocating crowd and unending walkways. I guess, Malaysians are not used to walking…


One thing that interests me while in the Vatican though, is a question from a Chinese tourist about how does the Vatican get to be so rich, in fact, the richest country in the world, as stated by the guide. Hmm…talk about the oblivious Chinese and the blinded-by-faith-guide. The guide simply couldn’t answer. (No wonder they prefer the ‘no question asked’ procedure). From her look, I could see that she was thinking, “Isn’t that a stupid question. The Vatican is a blessed country that’s why it’s rich. The money is just there…showered down from heaven. Now, deal with it”.

Perhaps, the Chinese guy could read her mind because I could see him thinking about “the hen that lays golden eggs in Jack and the Beanstalk”. But then..naahh..I don’t think the Chinese ever heard about that story too.

Anyway, the population of Vatican is around 840 and all of them work for and in the church of the Vatican or around the world as diplomats and representatives. The rest of the other 2,500 workers in the Vatican are mostly citizens of Italy and live outside the Holy city. The country practically lives on sales of stamps, coins, medals and tourist mementos; by fees for admission to museums; and by publications sales.

Wikipedia listed other industries that financed the Vatican include printing, the production of mosaics, and the manufacture of staff uniforms..but I doubt there are much.

So, how does the Vatican survives economically and how come it becomes so rich? I tried to find the answer but only found contradicting, conflicting information all over google. Some say the country survives on donation and that it is not rich at all, instead it is running on a loss. Well, I doubt that too.

The ‘richness’ of the Vatican somehow reflects in the activities of the Christians in our country and all over the world. I don’t think I am wrong to say that besides welfare activities which of course, needed millions or billions of money to pull through, the Christian missionaries are also ‘buying’ people to follow the faith…well, if, it could be called ‘faith’ at all. I hear them going around approaching ‘lost souls’ and offer lots of money to be Christians and help them spread the religion. Some are provided with comfortable living and much more, including tuition fees for the kids…

Unfortunately, this ‘lot-of-money-thing’ is what led me to question ‘faith’. Why we need to buy people’s faith? Is it not enough to offer the truth? Or is there any truth at all?

Why some say ‘homosexual’ okay in Christianity today and not before?
Why pray to ‘Allah’ instead of ‘Father’ all of the sudden? Why is it okay to kill the disbelievers according to the Old Testament, but it’s not okay anymore today?

Is there anywhere stated in the Bibles that the Christian teachings changes through times? If there was, then who decided on the changes? The Vatican? Or the people who financed the Vatican?

Today in Malaysia we see the Christians purposely inciting prejudice, creating conflicts and making unnecessary demands. If the Arabs and the Africans are going crazy with the Muslims extremists, Malaysia is forced to deal with the Evangelists who cannot keep their faith to themselves and must provoke and ticked people off.

For some reasons, the Christians in Malaysia must use the word ‘Allah’ and I don’t think even Jesus knows why.

The Evangelists must pick a fight with the Islamic authority and distribute the Holy Bible in Malay with the word ‘Allah’ in it and then blame the government for taking actions. I supposed that the attack against the Islamic authority is an indirect message to the power that be, the Sultans and Agong.

But why must the Christians do all these?

The truth is, it is not Christianity that is doing all these, but the Christians in DAP.  Just look at who is stomping the ground over MAIS and JAIS, all for the 'love' of 'Allah'?  

Isn’t it enough that the world has to deal with crazy Muslims Jihadis and Neo-Con terrorists? We don’t need Christian anarchists to add to the destruction.

It is about time for the Christians to wake up and see the truth. Can’t you see that while Muslims are being brought against each other to destroy their own world, Christians are being used as a tool by the Neo-Cons to rule the world?

Why? Because it is easier to use religion as a tool as it provides an automatic immunity when confronted. As a result, Christianity is being 're-constructed' as according to the interests of its financiers.  In order to understand who are the financiers, here's an excerpt from the book "The Vatican Billions" by Avro Manhattan, 1983" : 

The Catholic church is the biggest financial power, wealth accumulator and property owner in existence. She is a greater possessor of material riches than any other single institution, corporation, bank, giant trust, government or state of the whole globe. The pope, as the visible ruler of this immense amassment of wealth, is consequently the richest individual of the twentieth century. No one can realistically assess how much he is worth in terms of billions of dollars.
...The Vatican has billions of shares in the most powerful international corporations... The Vatican has large investments with the Rothschilds of Britain, France and America, with the Hambros Bank, with the Credit Suisse in London and Zurich. In the United States it has large investments with the Morgan Bank, the Chase-Manhattan Bank, the First National Bank of New York, the Bankers Trust Company, and others."
You see, DAP is using Christianity to camouflage its true colour of racism.  Of course, it would be most natural for the Vatican or any Christian society to help pump the money in for DAP in the name of Christianity.  And we all know that when DAP rules, the Singapore rules. When Singapore rules, the U.S rules. When the U.S rules, the Neo-Con rules.

So, clearly it is not about Christianity or Jesus or ‘Allah’. It is all about Malaysian Malaysia, right up to the New World Order. Therefore, should I ask, have you not seen the gog and magog that are standing before our eyes sucking away humanity?

I know that the Chinese basically have very little knowledge about the U.S conspiracy theory or the New World Order.  Only after MH370, that they started to learn a thing or two about it, but they could not make any sense of it because their minds are not trained to figure out anything else but money.

More Malays have ever heard of Rothschild, Freemason or Illuminati compared to the Chinese because Chinese are too busy being greedy to care about the world. Some Malays might be in the dark about it too, but they could digest the story better as they have been pre-warned by the Quran about the Jews, particularly the Zionists and their quest to rule the world.

What I’m trying to say here is that the Chinese should start ‘thinking’ instead of ‘breeding, roaming the earth and sucking everything dry’. Haven’t the Chinese realized that the new generation Chinese is only too eager to become Christians? Not because they believe in Jesus Christ but because they think it’s more glamorous to be one even though when they cannot pronounce their Christian names properly; Laura becomes Lola or Richard becomes Lichet.  What they don't know is that,  becoming Christians could mean helping some quarters destroy the nation, the country, the values, the cultures and the faiths, including Christianity itself.

So, if you chose to be a Christian then let it be because you believe in the teachings not because you like the idea of having a name like a Mat Saleh and celebrate Christmas.  You should know that you are following the wrong path when you are told that the wrongs are rights.  You should know that provoking and jeopardizing peace and stability is wrong.

Being a good Christian means being a good person and not go around poking into other religion’s business.

It makes me sick to see how the DAP trying to teach the Muslims on how to be good Muslims when they themselves are not even good Christians, what more good citizens. Christianity is having enough issues from within it, we don’t need to take up the problems of the Muslims to add to the confusion.

Anyway, I left Vatican and continued to look for myself in the rest of Italy but I didn’t find me. So, here I am, back home in Malaysia trying to make sense of how the Muslims in PAS and Buddhists in MCA have become the frontliners for the Christians in DAP while I myself, watch in disgust...

Bloodthirsty Muslims, or Christians?

I used to think that Islam is a religion of terror, until I started reading the Quran myself. I stop reading the Bibles after I got confused with so many versions of it. But I do acknowledge this: both books are about peace and love, or at least, they are supposed to. The ultimate objective of these religions, in fact, all religions, is to teach goodness to all mankind. It’s that simple.

Somehow, it is not as simple for mankind to be good. There is always, pride, lust, greed, anger, dejection, avarice and gluttony to deal with. Above all these sins that make life so much difficult, is ‘hypocrisy’. It is the hypocrisy, the pretention, that brings haywire to the world.

The U.S pretends to be the savior of the Arab’s unending tribal wars when what it is actually doing, is destroying the Muslims’ world altogether. The Muslims pretend to be devout Muslims by fighting for Hudud when they are actually fighting for power. The Christians pretend to be the righteous who bring order to world, when they are actually making a mess of it all.

I just came across a blog called ‘Christians United 4 Malaysia’ (CU4M) and there it is written on the tagline, “..in Allah we trust”. I have said it before and I’m saying it again that I have not met any Christians, not among my family or friends who pray to Allah. We don’t mention Allah in our Sunday prayers and this ‘Allah’ issue is totally isolated from the church.

Therefore, I have no doubt that the blog is clearly made with grisly intention, to challenge the Muslims, provoking, calling for a fight or initiating a war.

Now, why would any good Christian want to start a war? Why would any good person of any religion want to?

Then I realized that the blog is not taking a neutral stance in politics, which explains the ‘grisly intention’.

Christians make up to only about 9% of Malaysians and it is really not a good idea to start a crusade here. As good Christians would never start a war, wise Christians would never start a war, - here. Whoever is ‘testing’ the Muslims’ patience here, is definitely not doing it for the sake of the Christians or Christianity.

As a blog dedicated for Christians, CU4M should have known better than to unreservedly condemn the Muslims’ Hudud Law. Here’s why:

• Being a medium or spiritualist. (Stoning) (Leviticus 20:27).

• Trying to convert people to another religion. (stoning) (Deuteronomy 13:1-11, Deuteronomy 18:20).

• Apostasy - If most people in a town come to believe in a different god. (Kill everybody, including animals, and burn the town.) (Deuteronomy 13:12-15)

• Being a stubborn and rebellious son. And being a profligate and a drunkard. (stoning) (Deuteronomy 21:18-21)

You see, these sadistic punishments, (as the blog puts it), are written in the Bibles too. And there are many more, if only the blogger of CU4M would honestly admit.

If he would not do that, then the least he could do is not misuse the name ‘Christian’ for a political course.

The thing is, since Jesus lived before Muhammad and the Bibles came before Quran, did the Quran actually ‘copied’ these sadistic punishments from the Bibles? If so, why must we condemn Islam when Christians teaches the same things?

It seems that the Christians and the Muslims are both at lost here. So, the best thing to do when we lost our ways is to go back to basic of religion that is, ‘goodness’.

By that, it means empathy, fairness, forgiveness, peace, love. It also means that we must avoid hostility through provocation, fights or war. For what is the difference between a man who cuts the hands of the wrongdoers, and a man who provokes just to start a bloody war?

While Muslims are having problems putting ‘goodness’ above ‘hudud’, we, the Christians must not put ‘Christianity’ above ‘goodness’. After all, what is being a Christian without goodness in us? Good Christians tolerate, not provoke. Good Christians spread love, not war.

Therefore, if we cannot make the Muslims see their weaknesses, then we can at least try not to make things worse for everybody.

Son of God and the Crusaders of 13 May?

Christians and Muslims basically share the same history. They share the same prophets, with exception of Muhammad, for the Christians. The Christians believe that Jesus is the son of God while Muslims believe that Jesus is just another prophet, a human in every way, just like Muhammad.

Regardless of this little but significant difference, Muslims and Christians both like to make religion as the world’s matter, not a personal matter.

And of all the things in common of the two religions, there is one thing that the Christians have but the Muslims don’t, that is, power. The Christians gain power through knowledge. To put it in short: ‘Bright is Might’ and ‘Might is Right’, therefore, ‘Bright is Right’. At least, that’s how the world sees it which is why, people of other religions in Malaysia, such as Buddhists or Hindus, look up on the Christians and ‘want to be like’ the Christians. And it just so happened that the Christians represent the Mat Sallehs.

This is why it important to be bright because when you are bright everybody would say that you are right, even when you are wrong.

Even so, the ‘brighter and mightier Christians’ have issues with the Bibles, just like the Muslims with their Quran. The Muslims find that there are so many versions of Quran’s interpretation that some of them think Kassim Ahmad is a ‘kafir’ and some don’t think so. Some thinks that the Shiites are non-Muslims but some don’t think so.

Like the Muslims, the Christians are divided into so many churches of beliefs with three most common ones: Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Protestants.

Naturally, the Catholics think that they are hollier than the Protestants and the Orthodox and vice versa; and forever they disagree with each other on little things such as ‘what actually happened during Jesus’s Last Supper’.

Being the ones with power, the Christians have the ‘strength’ to come out with million-dollar movies to promote the religion and their versions of the truth. Over the years, there are few movies about Jesus Christ, eg. ‘Jesus’, “Passion of Christ’ and the up and coming soon, ‘Son of God’.

All of these movies had sparked controversies among Christians. The Passion of Christ, for instance, was said to be made by Catholics and so, the Evangelicals were a little uneasy, even ‘afraid’ to watch the movie.

The new movie ‘Son of God’ on the other hand, is said to be too Protestants and that the Catholics are called to not support the movie.

With all the fights with the Muslims over the name ‘Allah’ in Bibles, I foresee the ‘good Christians’ in Malaysia would be all too happy to embrace the controversy of the movie ‘Son of God’. The only difference is that, the Christians in Malaysia may not be looking at the movie from the Protestant’s, Catholic’s or Orthodox’s point of view, but rather from the Muslims’ point of view.

I’m not sure how many of the Malaysian Christians actually learn in-depth about which church to follow. Unlike the Mat Sallehs who firmly hold on to a particular version of Christianity with all their hearts, many Malaysians’ Chinese or Indian Christians I know, don’t really care about the many versions of Christians’ beliefs. They are not even interested to study it. All they want is to be Christians like the Mat Sallehs and who cares which version is the truth.

According to Wikipedia, the major Christian denominations in Malaysia include the Anglicans, Baptists, Brethren, non-denominational churches, independent Charismatic churches, Lutherans, Methodists, Presbyterian and Roman Catholics.

And for the record, among all these many Christians’ churches, the only parties that ‘permitted’ the word ‘Allah’ to be used in the Bibles is, the Catholics…and,..ironically, the Muslims’ liberalists.

The word ‘Allah’ in Bible had made headlines in the U.S too, some time ago. It created an uproar and strong objection from the Christians community all over.

In 2012, a Christian’s journal, ‘Christianity Today’, once wrote a cover story about it, “The Son and the Crescent”, whereby it received mounting protests on Christian websites and a petition to the translators by a consortium of Christian missionaries and leaders.

The Presbyterian Church in America (PCA) then officially rebuked Wycliffe Bible Translators' approach to translating the phrase "Son of God" for Muslims, where it replaced ‘God’ with ‘Allah’. The church recommended that the small denomination's churches withdraw financial support from such Bible translations if they remain uncorrected. Wycliffe was risking the support from the 3-million-member Assemblies of God that it eventually agreed to a review of its practices by the World Evangelical Alliance.

Two years before that, on January 9, 2010, Pastor Brutus Balan from the Baptist Church in Australia also stated that, the church did not agree with Christians using the word ‘Allah’ to refer to ‘The Lord’.

The fact is clear that Christians in majority, protest the word ‘Allah’ in Bibles.

Since the movie ‘Son of God’ will be coming to our cinemas soon, I just cannot help wondering how the Malay-subtitles is going to be. Will they translate it to ‘Son of Allah’? Would the Christians really go to that extend just to intimidate the Malays?

I’m not surprised if they do because I heard that there are calls made to start a Holy War. It looks to me like the Christians here have gotten the Crusades and the 13 May tragedy all mixed-up.

If this is true that some Christians are calling for a Holy War, then be reminded that there is nothing holy about politicizing religion. Leave politics to the politicians and racial provocation to the racists. Christians should just focus on being a good Christians.

Legacy Tunku Abdul Rahman Forum: Kit Siang’s Reliving the ‘Glory’ of 13 May?

Lim Kit Siang has never shown respect, what more appreciation towards any of UMNO leaders. For Kit Siang, all UMNO leaders are racists, idiots, bigots, corrupt, incapable, ineffective or simply useless.

However, Lim Kit Siang seems to have something good to say about Tunku Abdul Rahman, the first Prime Minister of Malaysia and the Father of Independence. Believe it or not, Kit Siang even delivered a speech at a forum held in honour of the late Tunku last Monday 9 February.

The forum ‘Legacy of Tunku Abdul Rahman’, was held in New Era College in Kajang whereby Ambiga Sreevanesan was also among the speakers. In his speech, Kit Siang praised the Tunku as a leader who didn’t give any room for extremists and traitors and promoted peace, love, harmony and prosperity.

Why is Tunku ‘different’ from other UMNO leaders in Kit Siang’s eyes? Why does the Tunku deserve his respect that other UMNO leaders don’t?

Let’s not get confuse here. Kit Siang does not respect the Tunku. It was the days of the Tunku’s ruling that he longs for. It was, during the Tunku’s ruling that Kit Siang managed to show the people the power of the Chinese! Tunku didn’t give room for extremists and traitors but his ignorance or perhaps, ‘naivety’ had instead gave the racial extremists and traitors like Kit Siang, not just a ‘room’, but too wide a space in the country.

No wonder Kit Siang speaks very highly of Tunku’s leadership. It was Tunku’s leadership that led us to the 13th May tragedy.

Isn’t it ironic that Kit Siang keeps warning us about the possibility of another 13 May but at the same time longs for the leadership that was blamed for the tragedy?

13 May tragedy had forced Tunku to resign and the country was put back to order by Tun Abdul Razak.
Therefore, if Kit Siang was honest in his expression of regret over 13 May, then it only makes sense if he honoured Tun Abdul Razak and not Tunku.

Apparently, the only regret Kit Siang may have over the tragedy is that the Chinese had failed to take over the country. Kit Siang himself was caught for inciting hatred and sparking racial tensions.

History spells Kit Siang as a ‘racial-tension engineer’. He knows how to initiate it and generate it and eventually blow it up. If we look very closely, read his blog postings, follow his speeches and watch his actions, we could sense that he is repeating what he did in the days before the tragedy.

Only this time, he has learned his lesson as to not be blamed. So, in his pre-emptive measure, he hinted that UMNO and the Malays are on the brink of repeating 13 May, while his party continues to provoke, challenge and even call for war, using disguises as Christians, NGOs or independent individuals.

It seems that this very irresponsible man is waiting for the moment when the Malays would burst in anger. He doesn’t care if his own people (the chinese) be the subject of attack because that would mean ‘collateral damage’ in a bigger war to take over the country from the Malays.

It seems that Kit Siang’s ultimate goal is to see the country being ruled by the Chinese. He doesn’t care of the damage that could happen in the process. That is why he longs for weak and clueless leadership where he could plan and strategize without being suspected.

Do you know that after the 13 May tragedy, the authorities had found hidden places where the Chinese used to stock food - obviously for supply during their much anticipated 13 May? This is a proof that the Chinese had prepared and planned for the bloodshed all the while.

Now, can we guarantee that they are not preparing, or already prepared for it now? Let’s hope not.

Let’s hope that most of the Chinese are more rationale than Kit Siang and have more sense than to sacrifice their very comfortable lives just to put Kit Siang’s clan in power. The chinese should know for a fact what a dictator this man is.

A man who doesn’t feel guilty or regret over a bloody tragedy is never a kind-hearted and fair leader. Would you rather put a cruel dictator to replace a fair and democratic leader just for the sake of racial power?