A Match Made in Hell: The Ruthless Jews and The Ignorant Muslims

If one person thinks that something is wrong with you then that person may be wrong.  However if everybody agrees with the person and insists that something is very wrong with you then everybody cannot be wrong.  It goes the same with the Jews:  If one country kicked them out, then the nation of that country might be bad or selfish but if all of the countries that the Jews ever lived had to kick them out, then something must be very wrong with the Jews themselves.  

Over a period of 1700 years, Jews have faced over 80 expulsions from different countries.  Just in Europe and Russia alone, the Jews have been banished 47 times in the last 1,000 years.   To name some of the places: 

1012 Mainz, 1182 France, 1276 Upper Bavaria, 1290 England, 1306 France, 1322 France, 1349 Saxony,  1360 Hungary,  1370 Belgium, ,1380 Slovakia, 1394 France, 1420 Austria, 1420 Lyons, 1424 Cologne, 1438 Mainz, 1438 Augsburg, 1442 Upper Bavaria, 1444 Netherlands, 1446 Brandenburg, 1462 Mainz, 1495 Lithuania, 1496 Portugal, 1496  Naples, 1498 Navarre, 1498 Nuremberg, 1510 Brandenburg, 1510 Prussia, 1515 Genoa, 1533 Naples, 1540 Italy, 1541 Naples, 1541 Prague, 1550 Genoa, 1551 Bavaria, 1557 Prague, 1569 Papal States, 1582 Hungary, 1649 Hamburg, 1669 Vienna, 1744 Slovakia,…etc…

As I said, logic says that there must be something very wrong with the Jews to be banished and live in exile all their lives.  So, what is wrong with the Jews?  Or is there really nothing wrong with them but a victim of horrible fate?

Whatever it is, whatever happens to them is definitely not a co-incident.   Your housemate found out that you have been flirting with his girl and thrown you out of the house is co-incident, but you being thrown out of your mum’s house and your neighbors celebrate your ‘exile’, is definitely not.    

The Jews are destined to live in exile.  Note that the key word here is ‘destined’. 

The most amazing thing is that their destiny has been written in black and white, long before they knew it would come true, which is almost like a fairy-tale.  Here’s what the Bible says about them:

Jesus said to the Jews: "Therefore say I unto you, The kingdom of God shall be taken from you, and given to a nation bringing forth the fruits thereof.  (From the KJV Bible, Matthew 21:43)

O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, thou that killest the prophets, and stonest them which are sent unto thee, how often would I have gathered thy children together, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, and ye would not!  (From the KJV Bible, Matthew 23:37)"

"You have heard these things; look at them all. Will you not admit them? "From now on I will tell you of new things, of hidden things unknown to you. They are created now, and not long ago; you have not heard of them before today. So you cannot say, 'Yes, I knew of them.'   You have neither heard nor understood; from of old your ear has not been open. Well do I know how treacherous you are; you were called a rebel from birth.   For my own name's sake I delay my wrath; for the sake of my praise I hold it back from you, so as not to cut you off.  (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 48:6-9)

"But now, all you who light fires and provide yourselves with flaming torches, go, walk in the light of your fires and of the torches you have set ablaze. This is what you shall receive from my hand: You will lie down in torment.  (From the NIV Bible, Isaiah 50:11

I understand that the Quran says the same thing too, more or less - about the Jews.   It is said that the Jews are stubborn, arrogant and very rude and therefore they are the lowest of mankind. They are ruthless and cruel but also coward and will create so much damage to mankind in terms of humanity, morality and the earth itself:

"And we decreed for the Children of Israel in the Scripture, that indeed you would do mischief on the earth twice and you will become tyrants and extremely arrogant! So, when the promise came for the first of the two, We sent against you slaves of Ours given to terrible warfare. They entered the very innermost parts of your homes. And it was a promise (completely) fulfilled. Then We gave you once again, a return of victory over them. And We helped you with wealth and children and made you more numerous in manpower. (And We said): 'If you do well, you do good for your ownselves, and if you do evil (you do it) against yourselves'. Then, when the second promise came to pass, (We permitted your enemies) to make your faces sorrowful and to enter the mosque (of Jerusalem) as they had entered it before, and to destroy with utter destruction all that fell in their hands. [And We Said in the Taurat (Torah)]: 'It may be that your Lord may show mercy unto you, but if you return (to sins), We shall return (to Our Punishment). And We have made Hell a prison for the disbelievers" [Qur'an 17:4-8].

'And those of the people of the Scripture backed them (the disbelievers) - Allah brought them down from their forts and cast terror into their hearts, (so that) a group (of them) you killed, and a group (of them) you made captives. And He caused you to inherit their lands, and their houses, and their riches, and a land, which you had not trodden (before)' [Qur'an 33:26-27]". [Adwa' ul-Bayaan 3/408]

"They fight not against you even together, except in fortified townships, or from behind walls. Their enmity among themselves is very great" [59:14],

"and if they fight against you, they will show you their backs, and they will not be helped" [3:111].

"And verily, you will find them (the Jews) the greediest of mankind for life.." [2:96].

Now, all these verses are written some thousands of years ago and here we are witnessing them, almost word by word.  If you are looking for God, then you don’t have to look further.  The Jews are evident that God exists. 

Of course, not all Jews are bad, but that doesn’t mean that the words of God are not true.  God has specifically caution us and remind us of the existence of such human who call themselves Jews or the Israelis or the children of Israel who will cause the world so much pain and damage. 

Ironically, it is the Jews too, who helped make the world a better place with their inventions and discoveries.  They are the ones who explore the earth and learn from God’s great universe.  They are the ones who knew better about the Power That Be, but choose to deny. 

The Muslims believe in these verses and take the words of the Quran seriously.  The Christians, however, are divided.  Some Christians are scared of being accused as anti-semitics or racists should they choose to believe in the words of the Bibles.  Some Christians even doubt the Bible and interpret it differently in order to suit what they believe as humane and just, that is to not judge the Jews. 

However, things are started to change around the world.  More and more Christians are able to see the truth and the world now agrees that it is the Zionist that is the problem, not the Jews as a race or Judaism as a religion.  It is the Zionists that give all the Jews a bad name. 

The Muslims, though taking the verses of the Quran seriously, never make any preparation to face the worst of the Zionist Jews.  Instead, the Muslims weep for their fate for decades, and wait patiently for the day where they will rise.  Nothing is done in between the waiting, except, of course, pray. 

The Muslims actually believe that they can one day rise, by just praying. 

Many Muslims believe that their horrible fate is a punishment for not being good enough Muslims and blame every other Muslims as sinners.  They blame the destruction on other Muslims for drinking alcohol, for wearing jeans or necktie that resembles the Zionists.

And most of all, they believe that it is the Muslim women not covering the heads is what caused the destruction of the Muslim world. 

Well, if this is true then tell me what happened to Afghanistan?  The women there are all covered up from head to toe and not allowed to go out and about.  The men have been claiming themselves as the ‘holliest of them all’.  Yet, the country was bombed back to stone-ages.

So, it looks to me that covering up all women and not drinking alcohol are not enough to stop the destruction of the Muslim’s world.   

The worst part is that the Muslims don’t even dare to admit that their theory is wrong!  They keep insisting that their theory of destruction is right even as they watch their brothers and sisters being killed by the Zionist and its proxies - for decades. 

The Muslims continue to preach on covering up the women and call all Muslims to pray harder - and that is all there is – for decades. 

Today, I heard that some schools in Malaysia have increased the hours for Islamic subjects and cut the hours for Math and Science in the Muslims’ effort to ‘rise’ again.

What they didn’t know is that while the prayers are meant to keep them on the right path and give them strength in spirit, only math and science can help them defend themselves, physically.  By cutting the hours for math and science, the Muslims are leaping further and further backwards, thus invite greater destruction to themselves.    

If only the Muslims take some time to think and not so busy pointing fingers at others, they will realized that the Prophet Muhammad too, didn’t win the wars just by simply praying.  Instead, he strategized and strived to be above the enemies.  The lesson here is that, even he, couldn’t win the war by just praying. 

Prophet Muhammad won the war because Allah helped him through brilliant strategies and great leadership combined with strong loyal men armed with adequate weaponry. 

This is because, Islam is a logical religion and I found this out from the Quran.  Allah works through math and science as is seen in the universe.   As such, it is said that the greatest and miraculous gift of all, is the ‘brain’ itself.  Therefore, you cannot pray and wait for miracle but you must create miracle!

The Zionists invented weapons to destroy you but they also invented tools and equipments that you use to make your life easier – the planes, the medicines, the cars, the facebooks…  How can you blame them totally when you have to thank them too?  Why couldn’t you invent these things yourself after all these lives? 

What have you been using your brains for if not for the good of mankind?  Why do you not follow the Quran, when you recite it everyday?  Why do you refuse to acknowledge the miracle of your brain, the greatest gift all?

And until the Muslims are able to understand this, and accept this and do something about this, ‘the rise of the Muslims’ as written in the Quran, may not come any time soon. 

I rest my case.  

The Singapore-Israel Love Affair

I'm sharing with you here an article from Huffington Post back in 2012 for you to ponder, as I think it is very relevant to my previous few posts on this blog.

 

(http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jim-sleeper/blame-the-latest-israelar_b_2147509.html)

Blame the Latest Israel-Arab War on... Singapore?

Posted: 11/17/2012 10:00 am

Israel's last big military venture into Gaza began soon after Barack Obama's 2008 election and before his 2009 inauguration. It's more than ironic that this is happening again between Obama's re-election and his coming re-installation.

But here I won't get into conspiracy theories or into "who started it" in 1936, 1948, 1967, 1973, 2006, 2009, or now. Been there, done that, and, tragically, not enough has changed since the last time.

What I do have now that I didn't in 2009 is a small part of the story of Israel's militarization that sheds light on Israel's inclinations and strategic judgments. Before telling it, let me emphasize that ever since I assessed the first Gaza war, online and on NPR, I've considered Hamas' end game and how it does business inexcusable. But equally so -- and arguably more stupid, because unsustainable -- has been Israel's long "holding pen" strategy against Gaza and, arguably, the West Bank.

Now that each side has again provoked the other's darkest impulses, I can offer only a bit of background to the tactically and technologically clever but strategically and politically bone-headed conduct of Israeli politicians. It concerns a country whose similarities to Israel are a lot more striking than its obvious differences.

In 1965, when Singapore declared its independence, its first prime-minister (and, for many years, its virtual dictator) Lee Kuan Yew asked Israel to design, set up, and supervise its military machine. Israel did precisely that. How successfully? Just this month, the Bonn International Center for Conversion published a world-wide survey ranking Israel the world's most militarized nation -- and Singapore the second-most.

You can read about the Bonn Center's ranking here. To find out how Israel and Singapore actually got together on this, you'd have to have been reading accounts like this one on"Israel's Deep Dark Secret Love Affair" with Singapore in Haaretz, one of several Israeli newspapers that, even when partisan, are far more open about Israel itself than major U.S. news organizations are.

I knew nothing about this love affair in 2009, when, while watching office parks and eight-lane expressways gliding by my window on a Tel Aviv-to-Haifa train, I mentioned to my wife that Israel has become the Singapore of the Middle East. I had no idea then that Singapore had long been the Israel of Southeast Asia not only economically and geo-politically -- as a glance at a couple of maps and statistical tables will suggest -- but militarily, with all the intimacy of that "Deep, Dark, Secret Love Affair" that's now nearly 50 years old.

The similarities of these two little engines that could (and did) become models of state capitalism with high per capita incomes and growth rates haven't often been noted. Both have been governed and stamped by the British. Both have populations of 5 or 6 million, including 2 or 3 million second-class citizens and non-citizens, some of them migrants, some of them openly despised.

Both Israel and Singapore are non-Muslim, and both face much larger, less-than-friendly Muslim neighbors -- in Singapore's case, Indonesia and Malaysia, the latter of which expelled Singapore in 1965 (or lost it, depending on who's telling), amid high racial tensions.

Yet another striking analogy involves the fact that the politically dominant majority of Singapore's population consists not of indigenous natives but of "overseas" Han Chinese," whose literary and commercial strengths long ago earned them the sobriquet "the Jews of Southeast Asia" and the envy and resentment due a wealthy, elitist, and supple minority.

Like Jews who live outside Israel, the Han Chinese are minorities in most countries outside China, but here a real difference dogs the similarity. The similarity is that in Singapore, the Chinese are 75% of the population, and Malays are 15%, Indians 8%' in Israel, Jews are 76%, with the rest mostly Palestinian Arabs, most of them Muslim some of them Christian. In Singapore the Chinese have a status, power, and reputation that will sound familiar to Palestinians and others who regard Israel's Jews as arrogant interlopers.

The difference is that Israel's Jews, unlike Singapore's Chinese, have never been the rooted, dominant majority in any other country besides ancient Israel itself, where Hebrew was spoken 700 years before Arabic. And there are other differences of consequence: Singapore is an island, a micro-state smaller in area and population than New York City's five boroughs. Israel is 30 times larger, geographically, and in some ways more dangerous and endangered.

That said, Singapore's and Israel's situations at international crossroads of trade and power at opposite ends of the Asian continent incline them both to serve as investment and cultural entrepots and as political mediators. Without oil, water, or minerals to speak of, both live mainly by their wits, which is to say by trade. But both are compelled to militarize, and both have formidable armed forces, with defense budgets that consume 5 or 6% of GDP, a proportion much higher than that of all but a few other nations, including even China.

The International Political Review calls Singapore's armed forces "the most technologically advanced military in Southeast Asia" and notes that while everyone in the region fears China and no one could prevail against a Chinese onslaught, China fears that any such onslaught would bring a very painful Singapore Sting.

The punchline to all this, not very funny but very, very true, is that no sooner had Singapore gained its independence in August 1965 than its British-educated founder and first prime minister, Lee Kuan Yew (whose eldest son is now prime minister), invited Israel to organize his armed forces, because he saw all the parallels between the two young nations that I've just noted.

On Christmas Eve, 1965, six Israel Defense Force officers and their families moved to Singapore, followed by waves of consulting teams that established the country's "Total Defense" combat doctrines, its recruitment and training regimens, its intelligence services, and its state-of-art arms procurement.

"We are not going to turn Singapore into an Israeli colony," chief of staff and future prime minister Yitzhak Rabin admonished these teams. He needn't have worried. Singapore's highly intelligent, eloquent, ruthlessly energetic dictator knew how to collaborate without being colonized, something one couldn't say about some of the Americans he's been collaborating with most recently. He was as deft and determined as the Han Chinese in other countries who, even as minorities, dominate major industries, banks, and even English-language media in the Philippines, Indonesia, Malaysia and Thailand.

The Israelis militarized Singaporean society, even with Israeli military songs, to which Lee's soldiers marched in one of Singapore's first real Independence Day parades. Less symbolically, they showed Singapore how to establish military conscription in a hitherto un-militaristic populace that, according to at least one survey, ranked the profession of soldier far below that of thief, while placing artists, teachers and merchants on top.

So determined was Lee to adjust this that when Israel won the Six-Day War in 1967, vindicating his decision to work with it and boosting Singaporeans' confidence in their Jewish military mentors, Singapore's UN delegation surprised other Third World nations by abstaining on a resolution condemning Israel.

Israelis persuaded Lee to make conscription universal to tap well-educated, prosperous Han Chinese as well as the Malay, Indian, and other minorities. That produced an intelligent, dynamic army and a disciplined male student population, and non-Singaporean university students at the country's universities can receive substantial tuition subsidies but must accept what the National University of Singapore calls "a service bond under the terms of the tuition grant to work for a Singapore-registered company for three years upon completion of their degrees so as to discharge some of their obligations to the Singapore public." In some professions, the mandatory service is to government agencies, for up to six years. Such disciplined incentives produce more than a little griping, but little softness or self-indulgence.

All this has posed an exquisitely discomfiting dilemma for Yale's neoconservatives, who never hesitate to ridicule leftists who've collaborated with authoritarian "Third World" regimes. Now they find themselves looking into a mirror and falling spookily silent about Yale's collaboration with Singapore in setting up an undergraduate liberal arts college.

When Shaunziming Tan published a damning essay about Yale's and other Western universities' collaborations with such regimes, Michael Rubin of the neoconservative flagship Commentary Magazine commented, quite rightly, that

"Foreigners flock to American universities because of their freedom and opportunity. How sad it is then, as Tan describes, that so many American university presidents are willing to compromise basic values in order to make a quick buck, often padding endowments which already reach billions of dollars. That will not bring progress; it is simply intellectual prostitution."

Unlike Yale in Singapore, Israel was smart enough to keep its name out of the public eye at the time, eager though it was to advance its national interests and prestige.

So it's noteworthy -- and perhaps commendable -- that Rubin condemned Yale and other universities for accommodating to an authoritarian regime that has worked so closely with Israelis without drawing criticism from defenders of authoritarian regimes at Commentary.

At least this should teach other neoconservatives what Yitzhak Rabin and Lee Kuan Yew always understood and what I learned after my epiphany on the road to Haifa: matters like these cannot be viewed clearly through binary, left-vs.-right lenses: Leftists who supported "people's liberation struggles" by helping to harvest sugar cane in Cuba or crops in early Israeli socialist kibbutzim believed that nation-building requires disciplined struggle and sacrifice to lay the groundwork for prosperity and, with it, national pride, often at cost to individual freedom.

But even in the 1960's, when Singapore was getting underway, it was already more authoritarian in its nation-building than Israel had been, at least among its own Jewish citizens, but even to some extent among Arabs who became citizens of Israel. Perhaps that was because Jews, fleeing recent destruction and facing new/ancient enemies with Western Enlightenment traditions, some of them as socialists, bonded in relatively more democratic, egalitarian ways.

Although Singaporean society hasn't had to be on military alert as much as Israel, neither has it become the Switzerland of Southeast Asia, a region bristling with huge armies. Singapore does have enough economic and military power to take another bit of advice that the Israelis of Rabin's time gave it and should take more seriously themselves than they have under Netanyahu: Keep your vast military under the radar, if possible while strengthening and showcasing your diplomatic, cultural, and educational offerings.

Singapore is trying to become the education center of Southeast Asia by setting up a liberal arts college that bears Yale's imprimatur, while controlling the showcase as tightly as it does the military. "Increasingly we are noted for taking up the knowledge industries and doing cutting edge stuff," says Ambassador Chan.

Note, though, that, in this official view, education is an "industry," perhaps even a "cutting edge" weapon of sorts. Can any liberal democracy ever hope to flourish while pacing a gilded but iron cage?

Correction: This post originally misstated that Michael Rubin "has propagandized for war with Iran" and has since been updated.

Correction: This post originally misstated the terms of Singapore's incentive program for university students. This has since been updated.

No ‘Allah’ Mentioned in 10-Point Solution

The case of ‘Allah’s name in The Herald’ now closed. The decision made was that The Herald is not allowed to use the word ‘Allah’ in its publication. Fullstop.

I do not understand how some Christians have a hard time to understand that. Soon after the verdict was announced, the Christians are already making a ‘pledge’ to continue to use the word ‘Allah’ elsewhere, except The Herald.

It is disgusting to see how some Christians PRETEND not to understand that the case was about The Herald breaking the law under Section 9, Selangor’s Non-Islamic Religions Enactment 1988, that says that the word ‘Allah’ is only for Islam and other religions are prohibited from using it in their religious activities or publication. Therefore, the Christians cannot use the word ‘Allah’ in The Herald or elsewhere in Selangor.

The Christians argued that this prohibition has gone out of the context of Article 11 and 11(4) on freedom of religion and wish to disregard the Selangor Law.

In that case, does it say anywhere in the 1988 Enactment that prohibits Christians from practicing their religion? No!

Then which part of Article 11 and 11(4) that has gone out of context?

Are the Christians’ prayers unanswered now because they don’t pray to ‘Allah’? Was it answered before? Are the prayers of the Christians in the U.S answered because they don’t pray to ‘Allah’? You don’t know. Nobody knows.

The truth is that, the Christians are only fighting for the rights to spread the religion through manipulation of the word ‘Allah’.

Well, the last I checked, manipulation is not a part of Christianity so does the word ‘Allah’.

So, which part on freedom of religion did the Christians not enjoy?

Like a stubborn child or a retard, some Christians refuse to understand. And now, they are using the 2011 10-Point Solution as a back-up argument.

I say, fine! Let’s read what the 10-Point Solution said:

Now, I’m asking all you Christians to answer this like good Christians that you say you are: Which part of the 10 points that allows Christians to use the word ‘Allah’ and bypass the 1988 Enactment? None!

Therefore, why are you doing all these my dear brothers and sisters? Why are you challenging the Law? Why do you want to create tension? Are you seriously asking for war?

Is this what Christianity taught us? If it is, then I’m out of it.

If you may see what is happening in Sudan today - a person can be sentenced to death just for being Christian. While in Central Africa, the Muslims are being slaughtered and massacred by Christians in a ‘holy’ Christian-Muslim’ war.

Now, thanks to you, the Christians are the new extremists and potential terrorists in Asia.

But of course, you will not pick up a gun and shoot the Muslims because that would be too obvious. You would rather be the ones who leak the gas and let the Muslims light the fire themselves. That way, you wouldn’t be blamed.

Like a true evil, you will stand by the side, quietly laughing as you watch both the Christians and the Muslims burn to hell.

Would the Christians who pray to ‘Allah’ please Stand Up?

Malaysiakini had published a statement by ‘Penyelaras Nasional Belia untuk Keadilan dan Keamanan’, K Sudhagaran Stanley on his plan to hold a peaceful assembly to protest against MAIS for refusing to return the Bibles to Bible Society Malaysia (BSM). Sudhagaran in his statement calls for all races and faiths, including Islam, to stand together against the Islamic Authority for the injustice done to the Christians.

He even calls for PAS leaders to join the ‘walk for peace and love’.

Another way to put this is, Sudhagaran is challenging the court for the rights to break the law. This looks no more like a political stunt by DAP to me – using an Indian to speak up against the Malay-Muslim authority while they watch and wait and heat it up in the oppositions’ media.

Before anybody decided to join Sudhagaran, can you please answer me this:

How many of the 9% Christians, particularly in the Peninsular, actually pray to ‘Allah’? I have asked the same question again and again but have not had any reply. We all know for a fact that even the newly eagerly converted Christian Chinese are not keen in using the word ‘Allah’ in their prayers.

None of the Christians I know would pray to ‘Allah’ simply because they don’t worship ‘Allah’. Many don’t even read the Bibles be it in any language.

‘Allah’ is the name of Muslim’s God but it’s not a direct translation of ‘God’ in Malay. If you want to have a fully Malay text in the Malay Bible translation then the word ‘God’ should be translated to ‘Tuhan’. Unless, you want to translate the Bible to Arabic, so maybe..just maybe, you have the rights to use the name ‘Allah’ as God.

But you have to take note that Allah for Muslims has no son. Allah for Muslims is one, and none other is associated to Him in any way. Allah for Muslims didn’t let Jesus die but saved him. Allah for Muslims is known as the All Merciful, All Loving and Forgiving.

Christians wants to include the name ‘Allah’ in the trinity concept and so ‘Allah’ for Christians is not one, but three in one. I don’t know whether the Christians is using ‘Allah’ to replace the ‘Holy Spirit’ or ‘Father’ but either way, they are not referring to the same ‘Allah’ as the Muslims for the Father has a son and the Holy Spirit is associated to both father and son. ‘Allah’ for Christians let Jesus die.

With this in mind, how could anybody claim that we are all praying to the same God?

We cannot claim that the Hindu Gods and Goddesses whom each has its own territory and capacity be taken as the same God as the Holy Spirit, Father and Jesus who is in charge of everything.

How can a boy named John who has blue eyes and perfect nose be taken as the same John across the street with green eyes and crooked nose? Can we take all Johns in the world as the same person? Just because BBC and TV3 are TV channels and both bring to us news and dramas, it doesn’t mean that they are the same body.

Some Christians in Malaysia are not up to argue on this academically or rationally. Instead, they disregard the Laws and sensitivity of others and went on with the use of the name ‘Allah’ in Malay Bibles and were ready to distribute them.

If this is not an act of evil, then what is?

It is only expected that such evil act is handled roughly by the authority. You may accuse me of betraying my Christian brothers and sisters but I’m telling you that this act of provoking and ignoring the law just to create tension in the country is an act of evil.

You see, this is what happen when you are too busy teaching Islam to the Muslims that you don’t know your own religion anymore. As a result, the Christians have become evil.

Not all though, but those who do not become evil, choose to keep quiet for fear of being labeled as a traitor to Christianity. Christians are aware that by using the word ‘Allah’ in Bibles means getting more followers among the lost souls of Malay-Muslims. And so, they condone the act of evil, believing that they are doing the right thing in the name of Christianity.

What is even more disgusting is that, there are Muslims or so they claimed to be, who choose to join this evil. These Muslims think that they are really fighting for justice in the name of ‘freedom of faith’, regardless of the fact that 99% Christians in the Peninsular don’t want, don’t need to and don’t use the name ‘Allah’ in their prayers. Perhaps, these Muslims don’t even know that.

Therefore, instead of keeping mum, the government could have approached these 99% Christians and get them to talk. Get them to tell the people that they don’t use the word ‘Allah’ in their prayers and they don’t need to. Get them to show to the people that these few Christians who want to pray to ‘Allah’ don’t represent the true Christianity.

The peaceful assembly against MAIS is supposed to serve as a challenge to the authority and the law. The objective is just to make things worse. I am sure, that they are counting on a confrontation from the Muslims which would raise more questions on Malaysia’s stability.

It looks like the evil is working hard to destroy the country. In time like this, true Christians should come out and make their presence and stance known. If the government don’t come to you then you come to the media and set things right. Tell the people whether you pray to ‘the one and only Allah that has no son nor an association’ or to the ‘Trinity God’? We don’t need to create tension just to use the name ‘Allah’ as Jesus hears us just the same.

I hereby call upon all true Christians to stand together with other Malaysians to make a pledge that we will never poke into each other’s religion just because we like their God’s name better.

Let no evil use our religions as weapon of mass destruction.

Is Christian a Religion, a Philosophy or a Tool?

It has been over a week since I last updated this blog. As you know, I was away on holiday, trying to figure myself out. I even went to the Vatican City to sort of renewing my faith and I must admit that I failed miserably.

The Vatican City was crowded over summer. Hundreds of people queued to get in. Inside, there were tour guides all around explaining Jesus to their groups and I took the effort to squeeze into one of the groups to listen and digest the information, or rather, stories. Well, in the end that was all that they were to me…stories.

It was hard to take things seriously with the naked bronze Hercules staring at me. For a moment, I was asking myself, what is he doing here? It was not his nakedness that bothers me, in fact, all other figurines and paintings are naked too, but rather the fact that he is kind of a ‘God’ in the place dedicated to some other kind of God, that gives me the ‘shiver’. I was imagining thunder and lightning as the Gods fight in the Vatican. I hope they forgive me for my imagination.

The Sistine Chapel was a full-house, overcrowded as the people waited for the Pope. Too bad, that the Pope didn’t make an appearance. I was disappointed as I wanted so much to hear what he has to say although I was firmly told to never ask question.

So, I left the Vatican feeling nothing but tired as hell for the suffocating crowd and unending walkways. I guess, Malaysians are not used to walking…


One thing that interests me while in the Vatican though, is a question from a Chinese tourist about how does the Vatican get to be so rich, in fact, the richest country in the world, as stated by the guide. Hmm…talk about the oblivious Chinese and the blinded-by-faith-guide. The guide simply couldn’t answer. (No wonder they prefer the ‘no question asked’ procedure). From her look, I could see that she was thinking, “Isn’t that a stupid question. The Vatican is a blessed country that’s why it’s rich. The money is just there…showered down from heaven. Now, deal with it”.

Perhaps, the Chinese guy could read her mind because I could see him thinking about “the hen that lays golden eggs in Jack and the Beanstalk”. But then..naahh..I don’t think the Chinese ever heard about that story too.

Anyway, the population of Vatican is around 840 and all of them work for and in the church of the Vatican or around the world as diplomats and representatives. The rest of the other 2,500 workers in the Vatican are mostly citizens of Italy and live outside the Holy city. The country practically lives on sales of stamps, coins, medals and tourist mementos; by fees for admission to museums; and by publications sales.

Wikipedia listed other industries that financed the Vatican include printing, the production of mosaics, and the manufacture of staff uniforms..but I doubt there are much.

So, how does the Vatican survives economically and how come it becomes so rich? I tried to find the answer but only found contradicting, conflicting information all over google. Some say the country survives on donation and that it is not rich at all, instead it is running on a loss. Well, I doubt that too.

The ‘richness’ of the Vatican somehow reflects in the activities of the Christians in our country and all over the world. I don’t think I am wrong to say that besides welfare activities which of course, needed millions or billions of money to pull through, the Christian missionaries are also ‘buying’ people to follow the faith…well, if, it could be called ‘faith’ at all. I hear them going around approaching ‘lost souls’ and offer lots of money to be Christians and help them spread the religion. Some are provided with comfortable living and much more, including tuition fees for the kids…

Unfortunately, this ‘lot-of-money-thing’ is what led me to question ‘faith’. Why we need to buy people’s faith? Is it not enough to offer the truth? Or is there any truth at all?

Why some say ‘homosexual’ okay in Christianity today and not before?
Why pray to ‘Allah’ instead of ‘Father’ all of the sudden? Why is it okay to kill the disbelievers according to the Old Testament, but it’s not okay anymore today?

Is there anywhere stated in the Bibles that the Christian teachings changes through times? If there was, then who decided on the changes? The Vatican? Or the people who financed the Vatican?

Today in Malaysia we see the Christians purposely inciting prejudice, creating conflicts and making unnecessary demands. If the Arabs and the Africans are going crazy with the Muslims extremists, Malaysia is forced to deal with the Evangelists who cannot keep their faith to themselves and must provoke and ticked people off.

For some reasons, the Christians in Malaysia must use the word ‘Allah’ and I don’t think even Jesus knows why.

The Evangelists must pick a fight with the Islamic authority and distribute the Holy Bible in Malay with the word ‘Allah’ in it and then blame the government for taking actions. I supposed that the attack against the Islamic authority is an indirect message to the power that be, the Sultans and Agong.

But why must the Christians do all these?

The truth is, it is not Christianity that is doing all these, but the Christians in DAP.  Just look at who is stomping the ground over MAIS and JAIS, all for the 'love' of 'Allah'?  

Isn’t it enough that the world has to deal with crazy Muslims Jihadis and Neo-Con terrorists? We don’t need Christian anarchists to add to the destruction.

It is about time for the Christians to wake up and see the truth. Can’t you see that while Muslims are being brought against each other to destroy their own world, Christians are being used as a tool by the Neo-Cons to rule the world?

Why? Because it is easier to use religion as a tool as it provides an automatic immunity when confronted. As a result, Christianity is being 're-constructed' as according to the interests of its financiers.  In order to understand who are the financiers, here's an excerpt from the book "The Vatican Billions" by Avro Manhattan, 1983" : 

The Catholic church is the biggest financial power, wealth accumulator and property owner in existence. She is a greater possessor of material riches than any other single institution, corporation, bank, giant trust, government or state of the whole globe. The pope, as the visible ruler of this immense amassment of wealth, is consequently the richest individual of the twentieth century. No one can realistically assess how much he is worth in terms of billions of dollars.
...The Vatican has billions of shares in the most powerful international corporations... The Vatican has large investments with the Rothschilds of Britain, France and America, with the Hambros Bank, with the Credit Suisse in London and Zurich. In the United States it has large investments with the Morgan Bank, the Chase-Manhattan Bank, the First National Bank of New York, the Bankers Trust Company, and others."
You see, DAP is using Christianity to camouflage its true colour of racism.  Of course, it would be most natural for the Vatican or any Christian society to help pump the money in for DAP in the name of Christianity.  And we all know that when DAP rules, the Singapore rules. When Singapore rules, the U.S rules. When the U.S rules, the Neo-Con rules.

So, clearly it is not about Christianity or Jesus or ‘Allah’. It is all about Malaysian Malaysia, right up to the New World Order. Therefore, should I ask, have you not seen the gog and magog that are standing before our eyes sucking away humanity?

I know that the Chinese basically have very little knowledge about the U.S conspiracy theory or the New World Order.  Only after MH370, that they started to learn a thing or two about it, but they could not make any sense of it because their minds are not trained to figure out anything else but money.

More Malays have ever heard of Rothschild, Freemason or Illuminati compared to the Chinese because Chinese are too busy being greedy to care about the world. Some Malays might be in the dark about it too, but they could digest the story better as they have been pre-warned by the Quran about the Jews, particularly the Zionists and their quest to rule the world.

What I’m trying to say here is that the Chinese should start ‘thinking’ instead of ‘breeding, roaming the earth and sucking everything dry’. Haven’t the Chinese realized that the new generation Chinese is only too eager to become Christians? Not because they believe in Jesus Christ but because they think it’s more glamorous to be one even though when they cannot pronounce their Christian names properly; Laura becomes Lola or Richard becomes Lichet.  What they don't know is that,  becoming Christians could mean helping some quarters destroy the nation, the country, the values, the cultures and the faiths, including Christianity itself.

So, if you chose to be a Christian then let it be because you believe in the teachings not because you like the idea of having a name like a Mat Saleh and celebrate Christmas.  You should know that you are following the wrong path when you are told that the wrongs are rights.  You should know that provoking and jeopardizing peace and stability is wrong.

Being a good Christian means being a good person and not go around poking into other religion’s business.

It makes me sick to see how the DAP trying to teach the Muslims on how to be good Muslims when they themselves are not even good Christians, what more good citizens. Christianity is having enough issues from within it, we don’t need to take up the problems of the Muslims to add to the confusion.

Anyway, I left Vatican and continued to look for myself in the rest of Italy but I didn’t find me. So, here I am, back home in Malaysia trying to make sense of how the Muslims in PAS and Buddhists in MCA have become the frontliners for the Christians in DAP while I myself, watch in disgust...

What is it with the Muslim men and sex?

Sex is clearly not a big issue in Islam but it seems that it is such a big issue, or the only issue there is, for the Muslim men. It seems that the lives of Muslim men are revolved around ‘man-woman’ relationship. We don’t have to go far to prove my point – just look at Kelantan, the so-called Islamic state or just look at most Malay men around us.

A simple honest handshake between a man and a woman is feared to have urged sexual desire or triggered ‘inappropriate’ visuals in the minds of the Malays. I was made to understand that the Islamic point of view in prohibiting ‘touching’ between different genders is said to be based on respect. If so, why all these talks about ‘inappropriate’ visuals and sexual desire? Didn’t it only mean that there is no respect whatsoever towards the women?

In the Saudi, women driving cars could also be mistaken as a slut. In many other Muslim countries, women not wearing hijab could also be mistaken as an invitation for rape.

And do you realize how Muslim men only have one ambition in life, that is to have two wives, or more? Of course, there is absolutely no love involved here, it is all about sex, sex and sex.

I’ve heard how some Malaysian Muslims got married just because they accidentally looked into each others’ eyes and that would mean that they have committed ‘zina’ and therefore must get married. I mean, these people must have ‘sex’ written all over their heads that they cannot do anything without relating it to sex. (Heck, I just looked at my assistant in the eye and was only thinking of whether she has finished the task that I asked her to do).

Whenever we hear the Muslims argue about Islam, it is always about how much flesh a woman can reveal, what could lead to ‘zina’, what could arouse the men and the sorts.

The Muslims even referred to their women as perfectly wrapped ‘candies’ and their women are to take the analogy it as an honour. My woman would snap if I ever referred to her as ‘food’ and she has the right to because she’s not made by God to be eaten by men.

Referring to women as candies shows how zero respect the Muslim men have towards their women. I’m sure many would argue on this but I have the rights to my opinions just as they have the rights to theirs. I believe that referring to women as food is totally against the Quran. It is an insult to the God’s given brains to the women.

The Quran says that women are to be respected, protected and loved, NOT eaten, whether literally or metaphorically.

Women have the rights to choose, to think, to have opinions and therefore attitude and characters. In other words, women have the rights to live and express herself through her choice of clothes and words and actions. Of course, all these are subjected to some rules and limitation of sane, civilized beings.

If the women have disregarded these rules and gone beyond the limits, the men have to treat them with respect nevertheless and protect them just the same, like sane, civilized beings.

We must treat everybody with respect regardless of their appearance, and this, I believe a the teachings from the Quran. If you teach the people otherwise, the world would be in haywire, like the Muslim countries.

I’ll give you an example, if you tell a boy that women in skirts are bad women and deserve no respect, I’ll bet that the boy would start looking at women’s legs as sex object.

And then you go on telling the boy that women in skirts are actually inviting boys to look at them. You know what would happen then? Yes, the boy then starts imagining the word ‘inviting’.

Without ‘respect’ and with the mind trying to figure out the ‘invitation’, the boy finally thinks that sexual attack against a woman is not really wrong, should the woman fits the category of ‘bad woman’. He felt no guilt before and absolutely no guilt after. The only feeling he has, perhaps, is afraid of the Law, but never of God because ‘God would understand that it wasn’t his fault at all’.

This is how rape become a ‘norm’ in a community, a no big deal, a nobody’s business but the victim’s.

And this is why the rape of a teenage girl by 38 men that shocked the nation last week did not exactly shocked the Kelantanese.

But I also heard that girls and women in Kelantan are all covered up. So, if they are all covered up, why are they the target of rape still? What happened to the perfectly wrapped candies? The men just tear up the wrapper and push it down the throat anyway… So much of ‘respect’ eh?

Unfortunately, this is how Islam is taught in Malaysia and probably, around the world. The hollier the Muslim is, the more sexual he becomes. The more ‘Islamic’ a country or a state is, the more sex-related crime there is.

Why can’t the Muslims just admit it that it is not what the women wear, but the upbringing of the men that led to sexual crimes against women.

The Muslim men must stop thinking of sex day in and day out and find better things to think of. Stop reading about what not to do to a woman and start reading about what to do in life instead - that is to seek knowledge from the universe, which I believe, is the teachings of the Quran.

The more empty space you have in your head, the more space you have for evil to breed. Your brain is the most powerful, most sophisticated creation – use it to the limit, don’t let it stay idle, which I believe is the teachings of the Quran too.

Some wise people said that sex is about temporary brain malfunction. Too much of it might mean brain damage. Maybe this is why all Muslim countries are a gone case - the Muslim men have brain damage. They think about sex all the time. They see sex in women driving cars. They see sex in women’s hair and women’s legs and eyes. They see sex in a simple, respectable handshake or in washing hair in salons.

They long to marry one, two, three and four women at a time. Oh yes, I’ve met a Muslim men with kids everywhere that he barely know them and I thought, “yikes! even my cat can keep track of its children”.

From the way the Muslim men behave, I could have mistaken that the Quran is all about sex.

Fortunately, I took the trouble to read it and I’m telling you that the Quran is not about sex but is about science! How could the Muslims missed that?

Reminder to All Christian-Chinese

I'm sharing with you here a letter from a Chinese woman, who once lived in Indonesia in the late 1990s. She had witnessed the killing and raping of the Chinese ethnic by the Indonesians, who have had enough of the economic imbalance in the country.

The letter is published by a blog called ChristianUnited4Malaysia I have mentioned this blog before, in my previous writings.

The message is clear, that is, to not provoke the Muslims too far but what is funny is that, the blog itself is doing just that. It even use the name 'Allah' just to pick on the Muslims. Looks like the hypocrisy of the Evangelists has reached the highest possible level.

Anyway, this is a good reminder to all Christian-Chinese in Malaysia, and to the blog owner himself. For a full story and pictures, you may want to click here.

*******

Puan-puan dan tuan-tuan sekalian,

Apakah yang kita mahukan dalam kehidupan? Pada pandangan saya, kita semua hanya perlukan satu perkara sahaja. Kebahagiaan!

Di dunia dan dialam akan datang nanti kita semua ingin kan kebahagiaan.

Tetapi mampukah kita untuk mengecapi kehidupan sebagai seorang beriman yang patuh kepada tuhannya apabila kita terus menerus menentang sebuah kerajaan yang telah banyak memberikan kebaikkan kepada kita?

Saya rasakan ada kalanya tidak adil kita salahkan semuanya kepada kerajaan Barisan Nasional sahaja. Banyak bantuan dan kebaikkan yang telah diberikan oleh BN kepada kita. Walaupun mereka telah melakukan banyak juga kesalahan, tetapi dimanakah kita dapat kerajaan yang lebih baik? Ternyata tiada kan?

Saya pernah tinggal di Indonesia semasa tragedi Ambon sehinggalah pada tahun 1998 dimana tragedi rusuhan di Indonesia berlangsung dengan ganasnya. Sebilangan wanita kebanyakkan dari keturunan Cina dirogol dan dibunuh dengan kejam. Tanpa peri kemanusiaan. Polis dan Tentera tidak berbuat apa-apa pun, mereka hanya melihat dan ada yang ikut sekali. Bersyukurlah Malaysia ini diperintah oleh orang Melayu yang lembut tutur bicaranya, hatinya dan sifatnya.

Selama ini kita yang mengasingkan diri, sekarang pula bermacam perkara yang kita minta dari mereka. Tidak cukupkah apa yang kita sudah dapat. Kemewahan kita sudah melebihi dari segalanya. Tapi kita tekan lagi orang Melayu untuk membenci kita. Bahasa Malaysia pun tidak kita pelajari. Kita seolah-olah ingin berperang dengan orang Melayu. Atas dasar apa? Keegoan kita?

Saya orang tua, umur saya sudah cecah 56 tahun pada June 2014 ini. Saya amat kenal dengan bangsa Melayu. Mereka adalah sahabat, rakan dan menantu saya juga seorang perempuan Melayu. Berbuat baiklah dengan orang Melayu, karena jika kita bermusuhan dengan mereka, dan mereka sedar yang mereka telah ditipu, saya cadangkan orang yang telah provokasi orang Melayu itu siap-siapkan sajalah keranda. Orang Melayu adalah kawan yang baik, mereka susah untuk marah. Tapi kalau dah marah, hanya Tuhan sahaja yang dapat menahan mereka.

Saya pernah melihat amukan orang Melayu di depan mata saya semasa di Indonesia. Terus terang saya katakan, saya tidak mahu lihat lagi perkara tersebut. Hargailah orang Melayu kerana mereka telah menjadi jiran yang baik kepada kita disini.

Bersyukurlah kepada Yesus, bahawa kita berkerajaan yang baik dan sentiasa memastikan keselamatan terjaga. Janganlah kita terus bermusuhan dengan orang Muslim. Jangan ikutkan hati dan perasaan kita.

Setiap perkara yang kita katakan kepada dunia kita haruslah bertanya kepada diri kita sendiri "Apa yang Yesus akan lakukan?". Yesus akan berlaku adil dan kita perlu berlaku adil bagi mengikut perintahnya.


Maria Anthony Chin (56 years old)
Subang Jaya, Selangor Darul Ehsan.

Bloodthirsty Muslims, or Christians?

I used to think that Islam is a religion of terror, until I started reading the Quran myself. I stop reading the Bibles after I got confused with so many versions of it. But I do acknowledge this: both books are about peace and love, or at least, they are supposed to. The ultimate objective of these religions, in fact, all religions, is to teach goodness to all mankind. It’s that simple.

Somehow, it is not as simple for mankind to be good. There is always, pride, lust, greed, anger, dejection, avarice and gluttony to deal with. Above all these sins that make life so much difficult, is ‘hypocrisy’. It is the hypocrisy, the pretention, that brings haywire to the world.

The U.S pretends to be the savior of the Arab’s unending tribal wars when what it is actually doing, is destroying the Muslims’ world altogether. The Muslims pretend to be devout Muslims by fighting for Hudud when they are actually fighting for power. The Christians pretend to be the righteous who bring order to world, when they are actually making a mess of it all.

I just came across a blog called ‘Christians United 4 Malaysia’ (CU4M) and there it is written on the tagline, “..in Allah we trust”. I have said it before and I’m saying it again that I have not met any Christians, not among my family or friends who pray to Allah. We don’t mention Allah in our Sunday prayers and this ‘Allah’ issue is totally isolated from the church.

Therefore, I have no doubt that the blog is clearly made with grisly intention, to challenge the Muslims, provoking, calling for a fight or initiating a war.

Now, why would any good Christian want to start a war? Why would any good person of any religion want to?

Then I realized that the blog is not taking a neutral stance in politics, which explains the ‘grisly intention’.

Christians make up to only about 9% of Malaysians and it is really not a good idea to start a crusade here. As good Christians would never start a war, wise Christians would never start a war, - here. Whoever is ‘testing’ the Muslims’ patience here, is definitely not doing it for the sake of the Christians or Christianity.

As a blog dedicated for Christians, CU4M should have known better than to unreservedly condemn the Muslims’ Hudud Law. Here’s why:

• Being a medium or spiritualist. (Stoning) (Leviticus 20:27).

• Trying to convert people to another religion. (stoning) (Deuteronomy 13:1-11, Deuteronomy 18:20).

• Apostasy - If most people in a town come to believe in a different god. (Kill everybody, including animals, and burn the town.) (Deuteronomy 13:12-15)

• Being a stubborn and rebellious son. And being a profligate and a drunkard. (stoning) (Deuteronomy 21:18-21)

You see, these sadistic punishments, (as the blog puts it), are written in the Bibles too. And there are many more, if only the blogger of CU4M would honestly admit.

If he would not do that, then the least he could do is not misuse the name ‘Christian’ for a political course.

The thing is, since Jesus lived before Muhammad and the Bibles came before Quran, did the Quran actually ‘copied’ these sadistic punishments from the Bibles? If so, why must we condemn Islam when Christians teaches the same things?

It seems that the Christians and the Muslims are both at lost here. So, the best thing to do when we lost our ways is to go back to basic of religion that is, ‘goodness’.

By that, it means empathy, fairness, forgiveness, peace, love. It also means that we must avoid hostility through provocation, fights or war. For what is the difference between a man who cuts the hands of the wrongdoers, and a man who provokes just to start a bloody war?

While Muslims are having problems putting ‘goodness’ above ‘hudud’, we, the Christians must not put ‘Christianity’ above ‘goodness’. After all, what is being a Christian without goodness in us? Good Christians tolerate, not provoke. Good Christians spread love, not war.

Therefore, if we cannot make the Muslims see their weaknesses, then we can at least try not to make things worse for everybody.

Counting on Hudud to Unite the Muslims?

Firstly, I would like to offer my condolences to the family of Mr. Karpal Singh. Karpal was not a statesman or a hero, but he was surely an exceptional lawyer, a true politician and a gentleman. May he rest in peace.

Much had been said about Karpal’s lives and death, and so I’m not going into that. I am not going to discuss about Karpal’s role in the Hudud dispute either, as one death in DAP does not make any difference in the party’s stance towards the issue.

Hudud is a problem of the Malays, and the Malays only. It is the Hudud that divided the Malays and now they are talking about Hudud as a vehicle of unity. I am just wondering how practical is the strategy?

“United we stand, divided we fall” is a universal quote understood by all.

Today, our beloved Malaysia is no longer united. The country is divided into pieces of political ideology, fanatical supporters, race and religion. Still, we boast of our growth in economy, and positive ratings and believe that we stand as strong.

The only unity that exists is among the chinese community. The chinese has always stand together through thick and thin, through right and wrong. That way, they can force everybody else to accept that it is their rights to claim their wrongs as right. And that way, they can do no wrong and others are never right.

The Malays however, is totally the opposite of the chinese. They are aware that they are divided and very much concern over it. They want to unite, but too damn ‘holly’ to do so. The Malays always find their fellow Muslims brothers and sisters as wrong. Therefore, many of them choose to be in a party that can do no wrong that is, PAS. Muslims, especially UMNO members who are not a member of PAS are judged as unIslamic or in worse cases, non-Muslims.

Through naked eyes, there is no difference in the way both parties practice Islam except that UMNO has done more for Islam than PAS, in every way. If I am not a Malaysian and looking from the non-Muslim’s point of view, I would believe that PAS portrays the true Islam and that Islam is backward, unintelligent, and even barbaric. Fortunately, I am a Malaysian and I’ve been reading enough about Islam to know that PAS is not anywhere near to Islam.

In order to justify their ‘holliness’, PAS needs to differentiate itself from UMNO. Since both are practicing the same Islam, PAS needs to find a way to stand up as the only real Islamist. And so, PAS choose to wear gowns like the Arabs and announce the fight for a total implementation of sharia law, the Hudud.

As for now, Hudud, has been the only excuse left for PAS to not unite with UMNO. It is the only reason left to argue on UMNO being un-Islamic and PAS the true Islamist. The only problem is that DAP and PKR are not going to accept Hudud - not in a million years. Without DAP and PKR, PAS might as well kiss their dream of power goodbye and forget politics altogether. PAS is not willing to do that. And so, PAS hangs on to Hudud on one hand, and on DAP, on the other hand.

UMNO has always been very clear that the party does not see Hudud as a necessity, what more a priority in Islam. I have taken the trouble to ask around and found the same answer that there are no particular, specific guidelines on Hudud. In fact, again and again I found that the Prophet Muhammad had tried to avoid having to punish wrongdoers by Hudud’s punishment.

According to Hudud, rape victims are supposed to provide 4 witnesses with no deadly sins in order to prove the crime. However, problem number one is that Islam also stated that humans are no judge of other human’s sins. Problem number two is that, any sane person, what more a non-sinner, would never let such crime takes place in front of his eyes. And we are talking about 4 non-sinners!

These problems are what we called the impossible.

Failing to prove the crime would let the victim to being punished as a liar and should she got pregnant by the rape, she would be stoned to death for adultery.

Now, why would God give such impossible cases as guidelines, unless the law is not meant to be implemented?

Hudud is a picture of a perfect world where it is possible for humans to commit no sins and no rape would ever take place. A world where humans are so true and pure that no one will ever steal anything. And if the humans ever did commit such crimes, it would not be impossible to get a confession from them. For all we know, the wrongdoers that were mentioned in the story of the Prophet and Hudud, they all confessed to the crime and asked to be punished.

Unfortunately, our world is far from perfect. Our world is full of sinners and hearing them confessing to a crime is something out of this earth, what more begging to be punished! Even religious scholars can be evil, and the Quran had specifically stated it clearly. That is how corrupt our world is.

Although Hudud is the problems of the Malays, it starts to bothers me when UMNO chooses to play the same Hudud game. UMNO starts speaking the same language with PAS in the quest for Muslims unity. What UMNO forgets is that PAS brought Hudud up not because of Islam, but rather as a political tool. UMNO should never have tried to grab or share the tool with PAS. UMNO should just stick to its original stance on Hudud that it is neither a necessity nor a priority.

By showing support for Hudud, UMNO is opening doors for the suspicious eyes of the busybody superpower to peek into our affairs. Should Hudud be fully implemented, Malaysia will not be their ‘friend’ anymore, but rather their ‘enemy’. Every step we make will be monitored and watched carefully. Pretty soon, we might also hear about honour killing or craps like that and provide every reasons for foreign ‘intervention’ as the lines between justice and injustice is blurred.

In no time, the colour of terrorism will be painted in our country.

The Prime Minister has been promoting the spirit of moderation but somehow he does not see the importance to stop all these talking about supporting Hudud by UMNO members. It seems that he gives full freedom for every leader of UMNO to say anything they like and to make their own assumption on UMNO’s stance towards Hudud. He seems to not hear the shouts for Muslims unity through Hudud.

While unity should make the Muslims stronger, unity through Hudud will not give them the same effect. A united Muslims practicing Hudud Law will only be weaker than they already are. They will be busy judging and punishing people on every little thing rather than looking at the bigger picture of living. There will be more angry and mentally disturbed Muslims and there will definitely be more social problems and more crimes. Of course, not all will be reported so as to safeguard the name of Islam.

Admit it or not, the Muslims are not striving for the sake of justice, but for the law itself – not for the sake of Islam, but for the hypocrisy of it. Therefore, destruction is almost certain.

If Muslims are serious in wanting to build up strength, they should start with mastering science and mathematics, not Hudud. Until then, no law or prayers would save the Muslims from destruction.